Archaeologist Helps Pseudoarchaeologist find His Lane
A couple weeks ago, Flint Dibble appeared on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast for a nearly 4.5 hour debate with Graham Hancock.
graham hancock
Gunung Padang: What Archaeology Really Says.
A review of the archaeology and geology of Gunung Padang in Indonesia, a site profiled on Ancient Apocalypse.
Younger-Dryas Impact. Science or Pseudoscience?
The answer might not be as clear as we’d like it. But in this article, I’m going to give an overview and list the evidence […]
A Response to a Strawman Argument of Pseudoarchaeology
I wrote this in response to a question on Twitter about a statement made by a pseudoarchaeologist on a YouTube video.
Graham Hancock Has Questions. I have a few answers.
Yesterday, Graham Hancock posted a response to the SAA open letter to Netflix regarding his science fiction series, Ancient Apocalypse. Hancock had some questions. I thought I’d add some answers
Ancient Apocalypse: Summary of the series from a professional POV
Originally, this summary was found at the end of the review for episodes 7 & 8, but @FlintDibble recommended that I break it out into its own post and offer links to the other 5 reviews. It was, of course, a good idea, so I took his advice.
Down with Derinkuyu and the Scablands Scuttle-a review of Ancient Apocalypse 7 and 8
In this final review of Graham Hancock’s Ancient Apocalypse science fiction series on Netflix, we look at episodes 7 and 8 along with a summary of the series as a whole.
Fitting the Sky to the Ground. A Review of Ancient Apocalypse 5 and 6
“I know this is not science!” -Graham Hancock, ep. 5, (00:14:25)
Graham Hancock’s Ancient Apocalypse – A Review of Episodes Three and Four
At this point most of Hancock’s schtick is pretty routine, so I’m reviewing two episodes at once. I’ll try to stick to just the main points.
Graham Hancock’s Ancient Apocalypse – A Review of Episode Two
There is no mainstream in archaeology as Hancock so often says. The archaeology is either done scientifically or it isn’t. In this post, I’ll critique the second episode of Hancock’s Netflix series from the perspective of scientific archaeology.