-
Recent Comments
- Carl Feagans: Invented? Really? I suppose it is “invented” though not through the origin you ignorantly...
- Allen: I agree that the show is a fake and an embarrassment. Then again the “profession” of archeology is...
- dash dash dash.......: gonna “HAVE” you “ARCHAEOLOGISM… 221;. ILL not leave u!!!!!!!
- salted finds: my problem is that the show is FAKED. Finding a crusader cross from the 13th century inside of a...
- GregT: Carl – I’ve gotta say that you have an incredible amount of patience. Far more than I have. Thanks...
Anthropology
Archaeology
- A Very Remote Period Indeed
- Aardvarchaeology
- Abnormal Interests
- Afarensis
- Alun Salt
- Anthropology.net
- Archaeolog
- Bad Archaeology
- Biological Archaeologists: We Dig Bones!
- Digging Digitally
- Digging the Dirt
- Fagan Talk
- John Hawks
- Northstate Science
- Old Dirt-New Thoughts
- Secondary Refuse
- Sexy Archaeology
- The Dig Girl
Carnivals
Science
Science Discussion
skeptical
Badges
Powered By Invesp
Tag Archives: hominid evolution
Stone Tools of a new Hominid Species?
On 5/23/06, I blogged about Homo floresiensis: New Species or Modern Human? and I mentioned the debate over whether H. floresiensis represents a new species of hominid or just a pathologically affected modern human. These are the two primary dogs … Continue reading
Homo floresiensis: New Species or Modern Human?
One of the more fascinating debates in anthropology right now is the explanation of LB1, a.k.a. “the Hobbit,” –the proposed new hominid species Homo floresiensis. Found in 2003 in the Liang Bua Cave on the island of Flores in Indonesia. … Continue reading